Not Just Bush's War: Clinton Bombed Iraq in 1998 for WMDs & Ties to al Qaeda

By PS Read

Washington, DC

Listen to Agent G. Gordon Liddy & I talk about the Far Left's distortion regarding the Iraq War, their Weapons of Mass destruction and their link to al Qaeda below.

Left is an actual photo of Halabja, Iraq being attacked in 1988 with Weapons of Mass Destruction (chemical & biologic weapons) by "Chemical Ali" under the orders of Saddam Hussein. A result of American soldiers liberating the Iraqi people, was both Ali & Hussein were tried, found guilty of genocide & hung for "crimes against humanity."

The Left continually points their accusing finger at the Right & howls bloody-murder over the Iraq War, "It was Bush's War -- he only did it for his daddy! There were no Weapons of Mass Destruction & Iraq wasn't linked to Al Qaeda ! The war wasn't even about terrorism -- it's about Iraq's oil! 'No More Blood for Oil!"

These are the basic tenants of their thoughtless, anti-military, anti-establishment , blame-America-first modus operandi in vying for public support. But none of their statements are based on any fact whatsoever. They are made by the Left, and are only made to serve the Left's sheer political opportunism. Radicals shout these accords at the sake of the men and women serving to protect their rights, when more often than not, most radicals never served at all and wouldn't know about military affairs anymore than they do 1040 IRS forms -- heck, just ask Timothy Geithner!

Let these two videos do most of the talking. President Clinton refutes every sonnet of the Left's anti-war, blame American, electoral battle hymn. And let us be clear, there is nothing humane about the using human suffering to further a political agenda alone. After all, America did not attack or collude against itself. To believe Bush used the vehicle of war to drive his own political career is as communist-far-left as Van Jone's belief in a 9/11 cover-up .

Let's not forget about this little tid-bit of information: from The Global Security Organization, citing the UN Inspector's report "On December 4, 2002 UNMOVIC inspectors found mustard-gas filled artillery rounds at Muthanna. Iraqi officials claimed these rounds were previously declared." If the question is, "after 9/11 did Iraq have Weapons of Mass Destruction ," than the answer is yes. Scroll down to see what mustard gas looks like when used on a population -- like Saddam Hussein used on his.

1) Bill Clinton bombed Iraq in December 1998 because of Saddam Hussein's Weapons of Mass Destruction Program.

2.) Clinton's Secretary of Defense, William Cohen, testified that al-Qaeda's chemical weapons plant manager met in Baghdad with Iraqi nerve gas expert, Emad al-Ani. Iraq aided Bin Laden in producing chemical weapons (WMDs) and the plant was subsequently bombed in July, 1998. To summarize, first Clinton took-out Bin Laden's plant and then he bombed Iraq -- much like President George Bush .

1 of 9 Mass Iraqi Graves Found. An Estimated 200,000 dead

"Bush's daddy" moved Iraq out of Kuwait after a Democrat Congress voted on invasion and did so within three months time. Any resulting Iraq War was not done for his benefit at all. In fact, the Persian Gulf was considered the greatest invasion in military history. Not a defeat and nothing in need of "vengence" from his son. What a weak & utterly selfish argument from the Far Left & so transparent. Soldiers sacrificed during the Persian Gulf and now the Left move it to say it need be avenged. Tisk tisk!! 9/11 need be avenged dear left. Some call it Justice, while others call it "providing for the common defense."

Further more, IF there were no weapons of mass destruction, then who was Saddam's cousin, Chemical Ali, and why were there 7-10 mass graves uncovered in Halabja, Iraq? Of course they had Weapons of Mass Destruction. Hussein used them to kill 1 million Iranians during the Iraq-Iran War.



Does the Left actually expect people to continue to believe their proverbial smoke-screen about the war, when Iraqi Courts-- comprised of the Iraqi people -- found Saddam Hussein guilty of genocide? He was hanged for "crimes against humanity" and was indeed a terrorist during a war proclaimed on terror -- and voted for by Democrats!



Not too mention, Saddam Hussein circumvented worthless UN inspectors for nearly a decade, including post-9.11 when the International Community demanded he be forthright. Instead of cooperating, Hussein demanded a televised debate with President Bush -- much like Ahmadinejad does now with President Obama. The 9.11 Commission also uncovered that Hussein was funding suicide bombers in Palestine to the tune of $25,000 per family. The total amount spent by Saddam funding terrorism carried out on Israel was $10 Million.

Finally, if the war(s) with Iraq were really about oil, then can we please start drilling and producing our own energy in America? Going back to the 1980's, the Left has always limited the American production of oil to just 2% of OUR natural resources. If the war was because of oil, then it is the direct result of Liberal policy which blocks our own production. But the war was not about oil.

Iraq only contributes 5% to OPEC's total & are very weak in refining. If America was going to attack a nation for it's oil then it would be Venezuela -- who contributes 17% to OPEC -- the most of all other contributors, and they are run by a radical dictator right in our own hemisphere.

Of course using facts always seem to get in the way of the Left's own selfish, political opportunity. The only conclusion to draw is the Left's is only serving themselves.